<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sydney Shirts and Suits &#187; angled pockets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shirtsandsuits.com.au/wp/tag/angled-pockets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shirtsandsuits.com.au/wp</link>
	<description>your personal tailor...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:55:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Thin lapels on suits</title>
		<link>http://shirtsandsuits.com.au/wp/2009/03/thin-lapels-on-suits/</link>
		<comments>http://shirtsandsuits.com.au/wp/2009/03/thin-lapels-on-suits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[angled pockets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[one-button]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peaked lapel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thin lapels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ticket pocket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working cuff buttons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shirtsandsuits.com.au/wp/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t like the current trend towards thinner lapels.
We can make them. They&#8217;re cheaper to produce&#8230; marginally as they just require a little less fabric. But the excuse for them given by some (that they&#8217;re to match the more fitted jacket styles) just doesn&#8217;t hold up.
They are a great marketing ploy by some high-end fashion [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like the current trend towards thinner lapels.</p>
<p>We can make them. They&#8217;re cheaper to produce&#8230; marginally as they just require a little less fabric. But the excuse for them given by some (that they&#8217;re to match the more fitted jacket styles) just doesn&#8217;t hold up.</p>
<p>They are a great marketing ploy by some high-end fashion labels to create a clear point of fashion differentiation, so that people can be identified as wearing a suit from &#8220;this year&#8221; and devaluing suits from &#8220;last season&#8221;. If you like a thinner lapel, go for it of course. Just include it in the special requests section.</p>
<p>I like working cuff buttons. All of my suits have this. I like the openness of the cuff that this offers.</p>
<p>I love ticket pockets. Catching the subway with a ticket pocket is so much more convenient for me.</p>
<p>Twin vents on a jacket tend to sit better for most of us. Though vent-free jackets also look great, I like the added range of movement that the double vents offers. Beware that if you&#8217;re wearing a suit that you didn&#8217;t buy from us, please make sure that you cut through the fabric holding the corners of the vents together!</p>
<p>The last suit that I had made was a one-button, peaked lapel with angled pockets. To me, this is about as cutting edge as I could find &#8211; and I love the effect&#8230; Especially as I have it made from a General Manager Collection, 14-2 black self herringbones, a gorgeous fabric!</p>
<p><em>We can make whatever fashions you can imagine, though I must encourage you: Please make sure that you&#8217;re doing it because you think it looks better, and not just because you want a suit that looks more expensive!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shirtsandsuits.com.au/wp/2009/03/thin-lapels-on-suits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
